Throughout out reading so far in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, I have constantly been bothered by the perspective of the narrator. We discussed numerous times in class how he is not a reliable source of information, and this made me have some real issues with the book- I figured if we couldn’t trust him, we couldn’t trust the plot line whatsoever. However, after further discussion, I began thinking- how much can we really trust any narrator’s perspective? Every narrator, no matter how partial they may seem, has a bias. Even in our nonfiction novels last year, we could not fully trust the word of the author. I just hadn’t realized how much this bothered me until we were met with a narrator so obviously impaired. This idea made me have a change of heart, and think more deeply about perspective. Maybe we don’t read these stories solely for the validity of the plotline- the way the events affect the narrator have equal importance. So even though we may not be able to accept everything Chief Broom says as totally true, we can use this as a prompt for further analysis and see how the events of the novel change him. This realization gave me a new acceptance for narrators with more imperfect perspectives and provides room to see the novel on a new level.

Brooke, I share your same frustration and realization of the fact that we cannot trust the narrator's perspective. Viewing it from a larger standpoint, I feel that this can even occur in everyday life. Realistically, we have no way to prove the validity of any words spoken by anyone. I feel that we just choose to believe what we feel seems most valid. If one chooses to follow a narrator's viewpoint, these perceptions of the novel become skewed by the narrator's words. However, the images the author hopes to produce usually help to highlight certain aspects of a story and emphasize a deeper meaning in their novel.
ReplyDelete